![]() |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
![]() |
by Erin Feeney
"Good Lord, you're uncreative" Let me first say that I am very happy to announce that for the last article I wrote, more letters were sent to me than all of my other articles combined. Now it's time to address some of the questions raised by the letters that I did receive.
A strong number of people who wrote said that while for fun play, one shouldn't play a deck that is a copy. The most common example was Counterpost. One person wrote to me that in his playing area, nearly everybody plays Counterpost. And in another part of the country, people are playing Winter Orb decks. So, what does this mean, when 80% of the people who wrote me said that there should be more original decks, while in tournaments, 80% of the people play unoriginal decks? Well, it could mean a number of things. Maybe the copy-boys and copy-girls of the world are too busy looking for the next deck to copy that they don't have time to write? Or perhaps they are illiterate and can't send me mail? Who knows?
Is this true? Can a beginner have no chance whatsoever unless he/she copies a deck card for card? Well, not only is this untrue, but it sets the beginner in for a bad habit. They may feel that the only way they can win is to play copied decks. This is not right. A beginner needs to have bad decks when they start. It is good to just lump some cards together and play. From that, the player slowly learns a critical Magic skill: Trimming deck fat. Now, as I have said before, I have no problem whatsoever with people getting strategies or advice from other Magic players. What I do object to, is someone building a deck with the specific goal of copying that person's deck. This is just lazy thinking.
Note: Due to the responses to the last article, I have been considering posting a section on my column devoted to wacky decks. Please send any in if you have any, as it will show that people can make a good deck without copying the heck out of someone. Keep those letters coming!
Erin Feeney
|
![]() |